Skip to main content

Lyssna vs UserTesting: Which Research Agents Is Better in 2026?

Compare pricing, features, integrations, verified reviews, AI capabilities, security, and customer satisfaction — side by side, with no marketing spin.

Rating
Reviews
0
From
Free

in Research Agents

Rating
Reviews
0
From
Custom

in Research Agents

The Short Answer

Lyssna vs UserTesting, in 15 seconds

Choose Lyssna if…

  • You want the lower entry price
  • You need a genuinely free plan
  • You want to trial before paying

Choose UserTesting if…

  • You have strict security & compliance needs

Head-to-Head Scorecard

How Lyssna and UserTesting score

It's evenly matched — each leads on 2 of 9 measured dimensions.

  • Customer Rating

    Average score from verified user reviews

    Even
    Lyssna
    No reviews
    UserTesting
    No reviews
  • Review Volume

    Number of verified reviews — a proxy for adoption

    Even
    Lyssna
    0
    UserTesting
    0
  • Entry Pricing

    Lowest published starting price (free plan = lowest)

    Lyssna
    Lyssna
    Free
    UserTesting
    Custom
  • Free Access

    Availability of a free plan and/or free trial

    Lyssna
    Lyssna
    Free plan + trial
    UserTesting
    Paid only
  • Integrations

    Number of listed third-party integrations

    Even
    Lyssna
    6
    UserTesting
    6
  • Features

    Number of listed product capabilities

    Even
    Lyssna
    0
    UserTesting
    0
  • AI Features

    Capabilities mentioning AI, automation or ML

    Even
    Lyssna
    UserTesting
  • Security & Compliance

    Number of listed compliance certifications

    UserTesting
    Lyssna
    2
    UserTesting
    3
  • Platforms & Deployment

    Supported platforms and deployment options

    UserTesting
    Lyssna
    3
    UserTesting
    6

Feature Comparison

Lyssna vs UserTesting feature breakdown

Search or filter the full feature matrix — core features, AI, integrations, APIs, security and compliance.

Lyssna
UserTesting
Overview
User rating
Pricing model
FREEMIUM
PAID
Starting price
Free
Custom
Free version
Free trial
Features
Key capabilities
AI features
Integrations & API
Integrations
FigmaSlackZapierSketchAdobe XDMiro
FigmaMiroSlackJiraQualtricsSalesforce
Public API
Platforms
Deployment
CloudSaaS
CloudSaaS
Platforms
Web
WebiOSAndroidAPI
Mobile support
Security & Compliance
Compliance
SOC 2GDPR
SOC 2GDPRISO 27001
Vendor
Company
Verified
Founded
2008
2007
Headquarters
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
San Francisco, California, United States

Pricing Comparison

Lyssna vs UserTesting pricing

Entry pricing, plan tiers and the cost factors that shape total cost of ownership.

Lyssna

Free to start
FreeFree
  • Surveys and preference tests
  • Basic tests
  • Limited responses
  • Figma testing
Pro
  • Priority support
  • Unlimited tests
  • Participant panel
  • Advanced targeting

UserTesting

Custom to start
EssentialsCustom
  • User testing sessions
  • Video feedback
  • Templates
  • Participant network
EnterpriseCustom
  • Everything in Essentials
  • Governance
  • Advanced analysis
  • Dedicated support

Total cost of ownership factors

Free planLyssna UserTesting
Free trial to evaluateLyssna UserTesting
Transparent published pricingLyssna UserTesting
Public API (build vs. buy add-ons)Lyssna UserTesting

Beyond list price, factor in implementation, training, add-ons and per-seat scaling when estimating total cost of ownership.

Pros & Cons

Lyssna vs UserTesting: strengths and trade-offs

Lyssna

Pros

  • Free plan available
  • Free trial offered
  • Compliance: SOC 2, GDPR
  • Public API available

Cons

    UserTesting

    Pros

    • Compliance: SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001
    • Public API available

    Cons

    • No free plan
    • No free trial
    • Pricing is quote-based (less transparent)

    Buyer Fit

    Who should use Lyssna vs UserTesting?

    Startups

    Lyssna

    Lyssna keeps early-stage costs lowest with its entry tier.

    Small businesses

    Lyssna

    Lyssna offers the most accessible pricing for lean teams.

    Agencies

    Either

    Either connects to more tools for multi-client workflows.

    Enterprises

    UserTesting

    UserTesting leads on compliance and breadth for complex needs.

    Ecommerce

    Either

    Either integrates with more of the commerce stack.

    SaaS companies

    Either

    Either is the more developer- and automation-friendly choice.

    Integration overlap

    Shared integrations (3)

    FigmaSlackMiro

    Only in Lyssna (3)

    ZapierSketchAdobe XD

    Only in UserTesting (3)

    JiraQualtricsSalesforce

    Keep Exploring

    Other alternatives worth considering

    Similar research agents products buyers compare alongside Lyssna and UserTesting.

    Ask SIA which solution fits your business

    SIA, Saaskart's AI buying assistant, weighs Lyssna and UserTesting against your team size, budget, integrations and compliance needs — then recommends the right fit and the questions to ask each vendor.

    Get a personalised recommendation

    Lyssna vs UserTesting — Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between Lyssna and UserTesting?

    Lyssna and UserTesting are both Research Agents solutions. Lyssna is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users, while UserTesting is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users. The main differences lie in pricing, features, and target audience.

    Which is better, Lyssna or UserTesting?

    Based on user ratings, Lyssna scores higher at 0.0/5. The best choice depends on your team size, budget, and specific requirements.

    Which is cheaper, Lyssna or UserTesting?

    Lyssna is the more affordable option with a free plan available.

    Does Lyssna or UserTesting have a free plan?

    Lyssna offers a free plan. UserTesting does not have a free tier but does offer a free trial.

    Can I switch from Lyssna to UserTesting?

    Switching between Lyssna and UserTesting is possible. Both support data export. Check integration compatibility and plan for data migration to minimise disruption to your team.

    Who should use Lyssna vs UserTesting?

    Lyssna is best suited for teams that prioritise enterprise features. UserTesting works well for teams needing advanced capabilities.

    Our Verdict

    The bottom line on Lyssna vs UserTesting

    Best Overall

    Either

    It's a tie balances user satisfaction and proven adoption.

    Best for Startups

    Lyssna

    Lyssna has the friendliest entry point for new teams.

    Best for Enterprise

    UserTesting

    UserTesting leads on compliance and feature breadth.

    Best Value

    Lyssna

    Lyssna delivers the lowest cost to get started.

    Best AI Features

    Either

    Comparable AI capabilities on both sides.

    Highest Rated

    Either

    Both earn equal user ratings.

    Ready to decide between Lyssna and UserTesting?

    Get a recommendation

    Not sure which to choose?

    Tell us your requirements and our advisors will help you compare and shortlist the best-fit options — free and unbiased.

    • A real human, fast

      Someone on our team replies within one business day — no bots, no ticket queue.

    • Routed to the right team

      Buying, selling, partnering, or investing — you reach the people who can actually help.

    • Independent & unbiased

      No pushy sales. Just honest guidance grounded in the ecosystem.

    • Tailored to your context

      Tell us what you need and we shape the next steps around it.

    Replies within 1 business day No spam, ever Free to reach out
    1. 1You
    2. 2Details
    3. 3Contact

    Who are you? Pick the option that fits best.