Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone): Which Cloud PBX Is Better in 2026?
Compare pricing, features, integrations, verified reviews, AI capabilities, security, and customer satisfaction, side by side, with no marketing spin.
The Short Answer
Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone), in 15 seconds
Choose Grasshopper if…
- You have strict security & compliance needs
Choose Quo (formerly OpenPhone) if…
- You prefer Quo (formerly OpenPhone)'s approach and ecosystem
Head-to-Head Scorecard
How Grasshopper and Quo (formerly OpenPhone) score
Grasshopper leads on 1 of 9 measured dimensions.
- Even
Customer Rating
Average score from verified user reviews
GrasshopperNo reviewsQuoNo reviews - Even
Review Volume
Number of verified reviews, a proxy for adoption
Grasshopper0Quo0 - Even
Entry Pricing
Lowest published starting price (free plan = lowest)
GrasshopperCustomQuoCustom - Even
Free Access
Availability of a free plan and/or free trial
GrasshopperFree trialQuoFree trial - Even
Integrations
Number of listed third-party integrations
Grasshopper6Quo6 - Even
Features
Number of listed product capabilities
Grasshopper0Quo0 - Even
AI Features
Capabilities mentioning AI, automation or ML
Grasshopper,Quo, - Grasshopper
Security & Compliance
Number of listed compliance certifications
Grasshopper3Quo2 - Even
Platforms & Deployment
Supported platforms and deployment options
Grasshopper4Quo4
Feature Comparison
Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone) feature breakdown
Search or filter the full feature matrix, core features, AI, integrations, APIs, security and compliance.
Grasshopper
Quo (formerly OpenPhone)Pricing Comparison
Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone) pricing
Entry pricing, plan tiers and the cost factors that shape total cost of ownership.
Grasshopper
Custom to start- call forwarding and routing
- Analytics and reporting
- virtual business phone numbers
- Standard support
- Dedicated support and onboarding
- mobile and desktop apps
- voicemail and business texting
- Everything in Professional
Quo (formerly OpenPhone)
Custom to start- Analytics and reporting
- shared phone numbers
- Integrations
- Standard support
- CRM integrations
- AI call transcripts and summaries
- Dedicated support and onboarding
- Advanced security and controls
Total cost of ownership factors
Beyond list price, factor in implementation, training, add-ons and per-seat scaling when estimating total cost of ownership.
Pros & Cons
Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone): strengths and trade-offs
Grasshopper
Pros
- Free trial offered
- Compliance: SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR
- Public API available
Cons
- No free plan
- Pricing is quote-based (less transparent)
Quo (formerly OpenPhone)
Pros
- Free trial offered
- Compliance: SOC 2, GDPR
- Public API available
Cons
- No free plan
- Pricing is quote-based (less transparent)
Buyer Fit
Who should use Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone)?
Startups
Either
Either keeps early-stage costs lowest with its entry tier.
Small businesses
Either
Either offers the most accessible pricing for lean teams.
Agencies
Either
Either connects to more tools for multi-client workflows.
Enterprises
Grasshopper
Grasshopper leads on compliance and breadth for complex needs.
Ecommerce
Either
Either integrates with more of the commerce stack.
SaaS companies
Either
Either is the more developer- and automation-friendly choice.
Integration overlap
Shared integrations (4)
Only in Grasshopper (2)
Only in Quo (formerly OpenPhone) (2)
Keep Exploring
Other alternatives worth considering
Similar cloud pbx products buyers compare alongside Grasshopper and Quo (formerly OpenPhone).
Ask SIA which solution fits your business
SIA, Saaskart's AI buying assistant, weighs Grasshopper and Quo (formerly OpenPhone) against your team size, budget, integrations and compliance needs, then recommends the right fit and the questions to ask each vendor.
Get a personalised recommendationGrasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone), Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Grasshopper and Quo (formerly OpenPhone)?
Grasshopper and Quo (formerly OpenPhone) are both Cloud PBX solutions. Grasshopper is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users, while Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users. The main differences lie in pricing, features, and target audience.
Which is better, Grasshopper or Quo (formerly OpenPhone)?
Based on user ratings, Grasshopper scores higher at 0.0/5. The best choice depends on your team size, budget, and specific requirements.
Which is cheaper, Grasshopper or Quo (formerly OpenPhone)?
Both products have custom pricing. We recommend contacting both vendors for a quote tailored to your team size.
Does Grasshopper or Quo (formerly OpenPhone) have a free plan?
Neither Grasshopper nor Quo (formerly OpenPhone) currently offers a free plan, but Grasshopper provides a free trial.
Can I switch from Grasshopper to Quo (formerly OpenPhone)?
Switching between Grasshopper and Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is possible. Both support data export. Check integration compatibility and plan for data migration to minimise disruption to your team.
Who should use Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone)?
Grasshopper is best suited for teams that prioritise enterprise features. Quo (formerly OpenPhone) works well for teams needing advanced capabilities.
Our Verdict
The bottom line on Grasshopper vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone)
Best Overall
Either
It's a tie balances user satisfaction and proven adoption.
Best for Startups
Either
It's a tie has the friendliest entry point for new teams.
Best for Enterprise
Grasshopper
Grasshopper leads on compliance and feature breadth.
Best Value
Either
It's a tie delivers the lowest cost to get started.
Best AI Features
Either
Comparable AI capabilities on both sides.
Highest Rated
Either
Both earn equal user ratings.