Skip to main content
Saaskart

Amp vs Cursor: Which Coding Agents Is Better in 2026?

Compare pricing, features, integrations, verified reviews, AI capabilities, security, and customer satisfaction, side by side, with no marketing spin.

Amp
Amp
Rating
,
Reviews
0
From
Custom

in Coding Agents

Cursor
Cursor
Leads 3/9
Rating
,
Reviews
0
From
$20/mo

in Coding Agents

Jump to scorecard Ask SIA

The Short Answer

Amp vs Cursor, in 15 seconds

Choose Amp if…

  • You depend on a broad integration ecosystem

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the lower entry price
  • You need a genuinely free plan
  • You want deeper AI and automation features

Head-to-Head Scorecard

How Amp and Cursor score

Cursor leads on 3 of 9 measured dimensions.

  • Customer Rating

    Average score from verified user reviews

    Even
    Amp
    No reviews
    Cursor
    No reviews

  • Review Volume

    Number of verified reviews, a proxy for adoption

    Even
    Amp
    0
    Cursor
    0

  • Entry Pricing

    Lowest published starting price (free plan = lowest)

    Cursor
    Amp
    Custom
    Cursor
    $20/mo

  • Free Access

    Availability of a free plan and/or free trial

    Cursor
    Amp
    Free trial
    Cursor
    Free plan + trial

  • Integrations

    Number of listed third-party integrations

    Amp
    Amp
    6
    Cursor
    4

  • Features

    Number of listed product capabilities

    Even
    Amp
    6
    Cursor
    6

  • AI Features

    Capabilities mentioning AI, automation or ML

    Cursor
    Amp
    ,
    Cursor
    1

  • Security & Compliance

    Number of listed compliance certifications

    Even
    Amp
    2
    Cursor
    2

  • Platforms & Deployment

    Supported platforms and deployment options

    Even
    Amp
    4
    Cursor
    4

Feature Comparison

Amp vs Cursor feature breakdown

Search or filter the full feature matrix, core features, AI, integrations, APIs, security and compliance.

Amp
Cursor
Overview
User rating
,
,
Pricing model
Subscription
FREEMIUM
Starting price
Custom
$20/mo
Free version
Free trial
Features
Key capabilities
Terminal and editor agentSubagentsShared team threadsLarge context useRepository contextPull request workflows
Agentic multi-file editsPredictive autocompleteCodebase chatNatural-language inline editTerminal command generationBug detection
AI features
,
Predictive autocomplete
Integrations & API
Integrations
GitHubGitLabVS CodeJetBrainsJiraSlack
GitHubGitLabVS Code extensionsModel Context Protocol (MCP)
Public API
Platforms
Deployment
CloudSaaS
Desktop
Platforms
WebAPI
macOSWindowsLinux
Mobile support
Security & Compliance
Compliance
SOC 2GDPR
SOC 2 Type IIGDPR
Vendor
Company
,
,
Verified
Founded
2025
2022
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, USA
San Francisco, California, USA

Pricing Comparison

Amp vs Cursor pricing

Entry pricing, plan tiers and the cost factors that shape total cost of ownership.

Amp

Custom to start
ProCustom
  • Higher usage limits
  • Terminal and editor agent
  • Email support
  • Subagents
EnterpriseCustom
  • Dedicated support
  • SSO and admin controls
  • Large context use
  • Everything in Pro

Cursor

$20/mo to start
HobbyFree
  • Limited agent requests
  • Limited Tab completions
  • Pro two-week trial
Pro$20/month
  • Extended agent usage
  • Unlimited Tab completions
  • Access to frontier models
  • Background agents
Business$40/month
  • Everything in Pro
  • Centralized team billing
  • Admin dashboard & usage analytics
  • Enforced privacy mode

Total cost of ownership factors

Free planAmp Cursor
Free trial to evaluateAmp Cursor
Transparent published pricingAmp Cursor
Public API (build vs. buy add-ons)Amp Cursor

Beyond list price, factor in implementation, training, add-ons and per-seat scaling when estimating total cost of ownership.

Pros & Cons

Amp vs Cursor: strengths and trade-offs

Amp

Pros

  • Free trial offered
  • Broad integration ecosystem (6)
  • Compliance: SOC 2, GDPR
  • Public API available

Cons

  • No free plan
  • Pricing is quote-based (less transparent)

Cursor

Pros

  • Free plan available
  • Free trial offered
  • Compliance: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR
  • Stronger AI / automation features

Cons

  • Fewer native integrations than the alternative

Buyer Fit

Who should use Amp vs Cursor?

Startups

Cursor

Cursor keeps early-stage costs lowest with its entry tier.

Small businesses

Cursor

Cursor offers the most accessible pricing for lean teams.

Agencies

Amp

Amp connects to more tools for multi-client workflows.

Enterprises

Either

Either leads on compliance and breadth for complex needs.

Ecommerce

Amp

Amp integrates with more of the commerce stack.

SaaS companies

Amp

Amp is the more developer- and automation-friendly choice.

Integration overlap

Shared integrations (2)

GitHubGitLab

Only in Amp (4)

VS CodeJetBrainsJiraSlack

Only in Cursor (2)

VS Code extensionsModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Keep Exploring

Other alternatives worth considering

Similar coding agents products buyers compare alongside Amp and Cursor.

GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot

$10/mo
Perplexity AI

Perplexity AI

$20/mo
Jasper

Jasper

$39/mo
Aider

Aider

$0/mo
Continue

Continue

$10/mo
Tempo Labs

Tempo Labs

Free
More Amp alternatives →More Cursor alternatives →

Ask SIA which solution fits your business

SIA, Saaskart's AI buying assistant, weighs Amp and Cursor against your team size, budget, integrations and compliance needs, then recommends the right fit and the questions to ask each vendor.

Get a personalised recommendation

Amp vs Cursor, Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Amp and Cursor?

Amp and Cursor are both Coding Agents solutions. Amp is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users, while Cursor is rated 0.0/5 by 0 users. The main differences lie in pricing, features, and target audience.

Which is better, Amp or Cursor?

Based on user ratings, Amp scores higher at 0.0/5. The best choice depends on your team size, budget, and specific requirements.

Which is cheaper, Amp or Cursor?

Cursor is the more affordable option, starting at $20/month.

Does Amp or Cursor have a free plan?

Cursor offers a free plan. Amp does not have a free tier but does offer a free trial.

Can I switch from Amp to Cursor?

Switching between Amp and Cursor is possible. Both support data export. Check integration compatibility and plan for data migration to minimise disruption to your team.

Who should use Amp vs Cursor?

Amp is best suited for teams that prioritise enterprise features. Cursor works well for teams looking to start free and scale.

Our Verdict

The bottom line on Amp vs Cursor

Best Overall

Either

It's a tie balances user satisfaction and proven adoption.

Best for Startups

Cursor

Cursor has the friendliest entry point for new teams.

Best for Enterprise

Either

It's a tie leads on compliance and feature breadth.

Best Value

Cursor

Cursor delivers the lowest cost to get started.

Best AI Features

Cursor

Cursor ships more AI and automation.

Highest Rated

Either

Both earn equal user ratings.

Ready to decide between Amp and Cursor?

Visit Amp Visit Cursor Ask SIA
Compare more alternatives →

Get a recommendation

Not sure which to choose?

Tell us your requirements and our advisors will help you compare and shortlist the best-fit options, free and unbiased.

  • A real human, fast

    Someone on our team replies within one business day, no bots, no ticket queue.

  • Routed to the right team

    Buying, selling, partnering, or investing, you reach the people who can actually help.

  • Independent & unbiased

    No pushy sales. Just honest guidance grounded in the ecosystem.

  • Tailored to your context

    Tell us what you need and we shape the next steps around it.

Replies within 1 business day No spam, ever Free to reach out
  1. 1You
  2. 2Details
  3. 3Contact

Who are you? Pick the option that fits best.