Revizto vs Tekla Structural Designer

Revizto

Visit

Tekla Structural Designer

Visit

Description

Revizto

Revizto

Revizto is a collaboration software designed specifically for teams working in building and construction. It brings together all the essential project data in one place, making it easy for everyone fr... Read More
Tekla Structural Designer

Tekla Structural Designer

Tekla Structural Designer is a user-friendly software tailored for structural engineers who want to streamline their workflow and increase efficiency. Developed by Trimble, this software brings togeth... Read More

Comprehensive Overview: Revizto vs Tekla Structural Designer

Revizto and Tekla Structural Designer are both software solutions that cater to the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry, but they serve different functions and markets. Below is a comprehensive overview of each product:

Revizto

a) Primary Functions and Target Markets

  • Primary Functions: Revizto is a cloud-based Integrated Collaboration Platform (ICP) that focuses on real-time collaboration and issue tracking for BIM projects. It allows users to unify BIM intelligence and helps teams manage changes, identify and resolve clashes, and track project progress. Revizto enables the visualization of 2D and 3D models across various devices, facilitating communication and transparency among stakeholders.
  • Target Markets: Revizto is targeted at AEC professionals, including architects, engineers, contractors, and project managers who are involved in construction and infrastructure projects. It is particularly beneficial for teams that need to manage and collaborate on complex BIM projects.

b) Market Share and User Base

  • Market Share: Revizto has steadily gained traction in the AEC industry due to its focus on collaboration and coordination in BIM projects. While specific market share figures are not typically disclosed, its presence is particularly strong among firms looking for enhanced team communication and issue management tools within BIM workflows.
  • User Base: Revizto is used by a diverse range of businesses, from small architecture firms to large construction companies, across different regions globally. It is highly regarded for its user-friendly interface and robust issue-tracking capabilities.

c) Key Differentiating Factors

  • Real-Time Collaboration: Revizto excels in providing a platform where all project stakeholders can collaborate in real-time, making it easier to address issues as they arise.
  • User Interface: Known for its intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that allows for quick onboarding and use by all team members regardless of their technical expertise.
  • Issue Tracking: A strong focus on issue tracking and resolution, with tools to assign, track, and manage issues directly within the 3D environment.

Tekla Structural Designer

a) Primary Functions and Target Markets

  • Primary Functions: Tekla Structural Designer is an analysis and design software specifically for structural engineers. It offers extensive tools for modeling, analyzing, and designing buildings, focusing on both steel and concrete structures. It provides automation for design tasks and detailed documentation capabilities.
  • Target Markets: The primary users of Tekla Structural Designer are structural engineers who require advanced analytical and design tools for building projects. It is used in structures where precise calculations and compliance with building codes are essential.

b) Market Share and User Base

  • Market Share: Tekla Structural Designer is part of the Tekla software suite by Trimble, which is a well-known entity in the structural engineering sector. Its market share is significant among engineering firms, especially those focused on complex building designs and infrastructure projects.
  • User Base: The user base includes structural engineering firms, large construction companies, and consultants who require comprehensive analysis and design capabilities integrated with BIM workflows.

c) Key Differentiating Factors

  • Advanced Analysis and Design: Tekla Structural Designer offers advanced analytical and design capabilities specifically tailored for structural engineers, including detailed calculation reports and design compliance checks.
  • Integration with BIM: Strong integration with other Tekla products and BIM processes, allowing for a seamless transition between design, analysis, and construction workflows.
  • Automation: High level of automation in designing and analyzing structures, saving time and reducing manual errors.

Comparison Summary

While both products serve the AEC industry, Revizto focuses primarily on collaboration and issue management within BIM projects, making it suitable for integrated project delivery teams. In contrast, Tekla Structural Designer is geared towards structural engineering analysis and design, providing detailed tools and automation for engineers. The choice between the two largely depends on the specific needs of the project—whether the emphasis is on collaborative project management or detailed structural design and analysis.

Contact Info

Year founded :

2010

+41 21 588 01 25

Not Available

Switzerland

http://www.linkedin.com/company/revizto

Year founded :

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Feature Similarity Breakdown: Revizto, Tekla Structural Designer

Revizto and Tekla Structural Designer are both software tools used in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry, but they serve different primary purposes. However, they do have some areas of overlap, particularly in terms of facilitating collaboration and visualization in building design and analysis. Below is a breakdown of their feature similarities and differences:

a) Core Features in Common

  1. 3D Visualization:

    • Both Revizto and Tekla Structural Designer offer robust 3D visualization capabilities, allowing users to view and interact with models in a three-dimensional space.
  2. Collaboration Tools:

    • They provide collaboration features enabling multiple stakeholders to review and comment on various aspects of a project. This is crucial for project coordination and reducing errors.
  3. Model Integration:

    • Both software tools support integration with Building Information Modeling (BIM) workflows, albeit focusing on different aspects of the model.
  4. Issue Tracking:

    • Each tool includes some form of issue tracking, allowing users to identify, assign, and manage project issues as they arise.

b) User Interface Comparison

  • Revizto:
    • Revizto is designed as an intuitive, user-friendly tool that provides a straightforward interface for non-technical stakeholders. The focus is on ease of navigation for quickly accessing BIM data, marking up models, and communicating within the platform.
  • Tekla Structural Designer:
    • The user interface in Tekla Structural Designer is more detailed and geared towards engineering professionals. It provides comprehensive tools and menus to conduct structural analysis and design, which may appear complex to new users but are necessary for performing detailed, technical tasks.

c) Unique Features

  • Revizto:

    • Unified BIM Collaboration:
      • Revizto offers a real-time collaboration platform that is accessible via the cloud. It is designed to bring together teams from various disciplines to collaborate on a single BIM model, regardless of their location or software.
    • Intuitive Issue Tracking:
      • Revizto has a unique issue tracking interface that's integrated directly with the BIM model, making it an efficient tool for communication among various stakeholders.
  • Tekla Structural Designer:

    • Structural Analysis and Design:
      • This is the core feature that sets Tekla Structural Designer apart. It provides structural engineers with tools to analyze and design buildings, conduct load calculations, and ensure compliance with building standards and codes.
    • Integration with Tekla Structures:
      • It tightly integrates with other Tekla products, particularly Tekla Structures, allowing for a streamlined workflow from design to fabrication.

In summary, while both products share some common ground in aiding collaboration and visualization in building projects, they are aimed at different users within the AEC industry. Revizto focuses on general project collaboration and communication, whereas Tekla Structural Designer targets structural engineers with a need for in-depth analysis and design tools.

Features

Not Available

Not Available

Best Fit Use Cases: Revizto, Tekla Structural Designer

Revizto and Tekla Structural Designer are both powerful tools within the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry, but they serve different purposes and are suited to different types of projects and businesses. Here's how they fit into various scenarios:

Revizto

a) Types of Businesses or Projects:

  1. Collaborative and Multidisciplinary Projects: Revizto is best suited for projects that require extensive collaboration among various stakeholders, such as architects, engineers, and contractors. It acts as a unified platform for streamlining communication and coordination among teams.

  2. Large-Scale Construction Projects: The software is ideal for complex, large-scale construction projects that need real-time collaboration and tracking across multiple disciplines and locations.

  3. BIM-Centric Workflows: Revizto excels in environments where Building Information Modeling (BIM) is central, facilitating model-based collaboration and integrated project delivery.

  4. Design and Coordination Review: It is a powerful tool for conducting design reviews and visual coordination, allowing teams to identify and resolve conflicts early in the design phase.

  5. Companies Emphasizing Remote Work: Businesses with remote teams benefit from Revizto’s cloud-based platform, which allows access and collaboration from anywhere.

Tekla Structural Designer

b) Scenarios for Preferred Use:

  1. Structural Engineering Projects: Tekla Structural Designer is specifically designed for structural analysis and design, making it the preferred option for projects where structural integrity and detailed design calculations are paramount.

  2. Steel and Concrete Design: Projects that involve significant amounts of steel and concrete design benefit from its comprehensive analysis and design capabilities tailored for these materials.

  3. Detailed Loads and Analysis: When a detailed load analysis and optimization are required, Tekla Structural Designer’s advanced analysis tools make it highly suitable.

  4. Integrated Analysis and Design Workflow: It is optimal for projects needing seamless integration between design and analysis, enhancing accuracy and efficiency.

  5. Medium to Large Engineering Firms: Medium to large structural engineering firms often find Tekla’s capabilities to align well with their needs for complex analysis and design requirements.

d) Industry Verticals or Company Sizes:

  • Revizto:

    • Industry Verticals: It caters to a wide range of verticals within AEC, including architecture, general contracting, MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing), civil engineering, and facilities management.
    • Company Sizes: Revizto is flexible and scalable, making it suitable for small design firms to large multinational construction companies, particularly those emphasizing digital collaboration and BIM.
  • Tekla Structural Designer:

    • Industry Verticals: Primarily serves the structural engineering sector within the broader AEC industry, focusing on companies involved in designing buildings and civil structures.
    • Company Sizes: It is particularly beneficial for medium to large engineering firms that require robust analysis and design solutions for complex structures.

In conclusion, while both Revizto and Tekla Structural Designer offer powerful solutions for different needs within the AEC industry, the choice between them depends on the specific requirements of the project or business, such as the need for collaboration versus structural analysis and design.

Pricing

Revizto logo

Pricing Not Available

Tekla Structural Designer logo

Pricing Not Available

Metrics History

Metrics History

Comparing teamSize across companies

Trending data for teamSize
Showing teamSize for all companies over Max

Conclusion & Final Verdict: Revizto vs Tekla Structural Designer

When evaluating Revizto and Tekla Structural Designer, it's essential to consider their distinct functionalities and target user bases.

Conclusion and Final Verdict

a) Best Overall Value:

The best overall value depends significantly on the user's requirements. Revizto is a cloud-based BIM collaboration tool primarily used for project coordination, while Tekla Structural Designer is targeted at structural analysis and design. Therefore, these tools serve different purposes; however, for projects requiring strong BIM collaboration capabilities, Revizto might offer better value. Conversely, for those focusing on structural design and analysis, Tekla Structural Designer would be more valuable.

b) Pros and Cons:

Revizto:

  • Pros:
    • Excellent for collaboration and coordination across multidisciplinary teams.
    • Real-time issue tracking enhances project management.
    • Simplifies communication between stakeholders by centralizing project information.
    • User-friendly interface and intuitive visual tools for navigation and issue resolution.
  • Cons:
    • Limited functionality for in-depth structural analysis and design tasks.
    • Primarily serves as a coordination tool, not a design platform.

Tekla Structural Designer:

  • Pros:

    • Comprehensive suite for structural analysis and design, ideal for engineers.
    • Seamlessly integrates with other Tekla products and certain CAD systems.
    • Offers detailed analysis options, including steel and concrete design.
    • Advanced simulation capabilities for complex structures.
  • Cons:

    • Steeper learning curve for new users, particularly those unfamiliar with structural engineering software.
    • The focus is on structural elements, which may not cover the needs of non-engineering stakeholders.

c) Recommendations:

  • Project Needs: Evaluate if your project primarily requires enhanced coordination and communication (Revizto) or if structural analysis and detailed engineering design are your main concerns (Tekla Structural Designer).
  • Team Composition: If your team consists of various disciplines needing cohesive collaboration, Revizto's real-time BIM collaboration might be more effective. On the other hand, an engineering team focused on structural integrity and design should consider Tekla Structural Designer.
  • Integration Requirements: Consider what other tools you are currently using and how well each solution integrates with your existing software ecosystem.
  • Training and Adoption: Be prepared for the training and adoption curve with Tekla Structural Designer if structural analysis is not a familiar domain.

Ultimately, choosing between Revizto and Tekla Structural Designer should be driven by specific project needs, team composition, and existing workflows. Each tool excels in its niche area, and the decision should align with the primary goals of your project and the technical demands of your team.