Hasura vs Software AG Adabas

Hasura

Visit

Software AG Adabas

Visit

Description

Hasura

Hasura

Hasura is the go-to software for simplifying the process of building and deploying modern apps. If you're looking to streamline your software development, Hasura has what you need. It provides an easy... Read More
Software AG Adabas

Software AG Adabas

Adabas, developed by Software AG, is a highly reliable database management system renowned for its speed and efficiency. If you're searching for a robust solution to handle large volumes of data with ... Read More

Comprehensive Overview: Hasura vs Software AG Adabas

Hasura and Software AG Adabas are two distinct products serving different functions in the database management ecosystem. Here's an overview covering their primary functions, target markets, market presence, and differentiating factors:

Hasura

a) Primary Functions and Target Markets:

  • Primary Functions:
    Hasura is an open-source engine that provides real-time GraphQL APIs on new or existing PostgreSQL databases. Its primary functions include:

    • Automatically generating GraphQL queries and mutations based on the database schema.
    • Providing real-time data queries with GraphQL subscriptions.
    • Integrating with existing authentication systems and supporting role-based access control.
    • Offering built-in support for serverless computing and microservices architectures.
  • Target Markets:
    Hasura primarily targets developers and companies looking to modernize their application stack by leveraging GraphQL for API management. This includes startups, mid-sized companies engaged in building real-time applications, and enterprises adopting microservices and serverless environments.

b) Market Share and User Base:

  • Market Share:
    Hasura, being open-source and relatively new in the market compared to traditional database systems, has a rapidly growing presence in the GraphQL API management space. It is particularly popular among modern tech companies and startups.

  • User Base:
    Its user base is diverse, ranging from small development teams to large enterprises across various industries, including finance, e-commerce, media, and more. Hasura's community-driven approach helps it maintain a dynamic and expansive user base.

c) Key Differentiating Factors:

  • GraphQL Focus:
    Hasura is focused on providing highly efficient and scalable GraphQL APIs, making it ideal for companies looking to adopt GraphQL paradigms quickly.

  • Real-Time Capabilities:
    Its support for real-time data subscriptions and dynamic API generation without manual coding differentiates it from traditional API management solutions.

  • Ease of Use:
    Hasura simplifies the process of hooking up an API to a database, which appeals to developers who need to deliver solutions rapidly.

Software AG Adabas

a) Primary Functions and Target Markets:

  • Primary Functions:
    Adabas (Adaptable Database System) is a high-performance database management system (DBMS) designed for big data and transaction processing capabilities on mainframes. Key functions include:

    • Handling high-volume, high-speed transaction processing.
    • Integrating with legacy systems and providing a stable environment for mission-critical applications.
    • Offering strong data replication and analytics functionalities.
  • Target Markets:
    Adabas targets large enterprises and government organizations that have substantial investments in mainframe infrastructures and need reliable high-performance data solutions. It is particularly prevalent in sectors like banking, insurance, and public administration.

b) Market Share and User Base:

  • Market Share:
    Adabas has a significant presence in legacy mainframe environments. While its overall market share in the broader database space may not be as dominant as it once was, it still holds a crucial role in specific segments that require robust transactional capabilities.

  • User Base:
    Its user base consists mainly of large organizations and governmental bodies that rely on high-speed, high-volume transaction processing. These customers often have long-term relationships with Software AG due to the critical nature of their applications.

c) Key Differentiating Factors:

  • Mainframe Integration:
    Adabas is designed to work seamlessly in mainframe environments, offering unmatched performance for legacy systems that few modern DBMS can match.

  • Transaction Processing:
    Its ability to handle large-scale, high-speed transactions makes it essential for industries that demand such capabilities, distinguishing it from more general-purpose databases.

  • Longevity and Stability:
    Adabas's decades-long history provides it with a level of maturity, reliability, and a proven track record that appeals to organizations with critical, long-term data needs.

In summary, Hasura and Software AG Adabas serve very different purposes and markets, with Hasura focusing on modern, agile API management and Adabas catering to legacy systems and environments that require powerful transaction processing. Their differentiators lie in their technological focus, architecture, and the specific needs of their user bases.

Contact Info

Year founded :

2017

+1 650-843-0988

Not Available

United States

http://www.linkedin.com/company/hasura

Year founded :

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Feature Similarity Breakdown: Hasura, Software AG Adabas

Hasura and Software AG Adabas are both database-related technologies but serve different purposes and have different architectures. Here's a breakdown of their features, comparisons, and unique aspects:

a) Core Features in Common

  1. Database Management:

    • Both support powerful database management capabilities — Hasura primarily as a GraphQL server for databases, whereas Adabas is a high-performance database system.
  2. Schema Management:

    • They provide tools for managing database schemas, although Hasura automatically creates a GraphQL API on top of existing databases, whereas Adabas focuses on maintaining high-speed access to complex data.
  3. Security Features:

    • Both systems offer various security mechanisms to ensure data integrity and access control. They have role-based access control for users and data encryption features.
  4. High Performance and Scalability:

    • Both solutions are designed to handle high-performance demands. Hasura does this by optimizing GraphQL command execution, while Adabas is known for its high-throughput data processing.
  5. Integration Capabilities:

    • They support integration with other software and services. Hasura integrates with PostgreSQL and many third-party APIs, while Adabas can interface with various enterprise systems and databases.

b) User Interface Comparison

  • Hasura:

    • The Hasura Console is a web-based UI that provides an intuitive graphical interface for managing GraphQL APIs, database schema migrations, and metadata.
    • Its UI is modern, user-friendly, and designed to cater to developers familiar with web technologies.
  • Software AG Adabas:

    • Adabas typically involves more traditional interfaces, often suited for IT professionals familiar with mainframe environments.
    • It relies on Software AG's Natural and other tools for management, which might not be as intuitive for users accustomed to modern web-based UIs.

c) Unique Features

  • Hasura:

    • Automatic GraphQL API: Instantly generates a GraphQL API on top of existing databases.
    • Real-time Data Handling: Via subscriptions, Hasura can provide real-time updates over GraphQL.
    • GraphQL Permissions: Offers granular permissions that are tightly integrated with database operations.
  • Software AG Adabas:

    • High-speed Transaction Processing: Known for its capability to handle massive transactions with minimal latency.
    • Natural Programming Language: Supports Software AG’s Natural, facilitating rapid development and deployment of applications in traditional programming environments.
    • Enterprise-Grade Transaction Management: Offers robust transaction controls suitable for mission-critical applications in large enterprises.

In summary, while Hasura and Software AG Adabas share fundamental database management features, they diverge significantly in their functionalities, with Hasura focusing on modern web developer needs through GraphQL, and Adabas delivering robust mainframe-quality solutions for high-transaction environments. Each has unique features catering to different user needs and technological ecosystems.

Features

Not Available

Not Available

Best Fit Use Cases: Hasura, Software AG Adabas

Hasura

a) Best Fit Use Cases for Hasura:

  1. Real-Time Data-Driven Applications:

    • Startups and Small Businesses: Hasura is ideal for startups and small businesses looking to quickly develop real-time data-driven applications without extensive overhead. Its GraphQL-based approach allows for rapid development and iteration.
    • Web and Mobile Applications: Companies developing applications that require real-time data synchronization, such as collaborative tools or social media platforms, can benefit from Hasura’s capabilities.
  2. Microservices and Serverless Architectures:

    • Cloud-Native Organizations: Businesses employing microservices or serverless architectures benefit from Hasura’s ability to integrate seamlessly with existing services and provide data through a unified GraphQL API.
    • APIs for Modern Frontend Applications: Teams building modern frontend applications (React, Vue.js, Angular) can leverage Hasura for efficient data fetching and management with its auto-generated GraphQL APIs.
  3. Rapid Prototyping and Iteration:

    • Development Teams in Need of Agility: Organizations that prioritize agility can use Hasura to quickly prototype ideas, iterate on product features, and respond to market demands.
  4. Analytics and Dashboards:

    • Companies Needing Custom Dashboards: Hasura’s GraphQL capabilities allow for creating custom analytics dashboards that pull data from various sources with ease, suitable for businesses across different sectors.

Software AG Adabas

b) Preferred Scenarios for Software AG Adabas:

  1. Large-Scale Enterprise Data Management:

    • Established Enterprises: Adabas is well-suited for large-scale enterprises that require robust, high-performance database management for critical operations, particularly in industries such as finance and telecommunications.
    • Legacy Systems Modernization: Companies with existing mainframe systems using Adabas benefit from its performance and reliability when modernizing legacy applications.
  2. Transactional Systems:

    • Organizations Demanding High Transactional Throughput: Adabas excels in high-throughput transactional environments (banking, insurance) where data integrity and rapid processing speeds are critical.
  3. Compliance and Data Security:

    • Industries with Strict Regulations: Businesses in sectors like healthcare, government, and finance that deal with sensitive data and have heavy compliance requirements benefit from Adabas's robust security features.
  4. Mission-Critical Applications:

    • Continuous Operation Requirements: Organizations that operate mission-critical applications requiring continuous uptime and rapid backup/recovery capabilities can rely on Adabas's proven track record.

Catering to Different Industry Verticals and Company Sizes

  • Hasura targets small to medium-sized businesses and modern tech startups looking for agility and innovation in software development. It excels in industries such as SaaS, e-commerce, and tech, where rapid development and scalability are prioritized.

  • Software AG Adabas is better suited for large enterprises and organizations with significant legacy investments. It serves industries where data consistency, reliability, and scalability are paramount, such as banking, telecommunications, and public sector.

In summary, Hasura caters to organizations focused on innovation and rapid development in modern tech ecosystems, while Adabas serves large enterprises requiring robust database management for critical operations. Each serves distinct needs depending on the size, industry, and technical requirements of the business.

Pricing

Hasura logo

Pricing Not Available

Software AG Adabas logo

Pricing Not Available

Metrics History

Metrics History

Comparing undefined across companies

Trending data for
Showing for all companies over Max

Conclusion & Final Verdict: Hasura vs Software AG Adabas

When evaluating Hasura and Software AG Adabas, it's essential to weigh the features, scalability, cost, ease of use, and community support each product offers. Both are powerful tools in their respective areas, but their suitability varies depending on the specific needs of an organization.

a) Best Overall Value

Hasura generally offers the best overall value for organizations looking for a modern, open-source solution that facilitates rapid application development with real-time GraphQL APIs. It aligns well with current trends in web development, particularly for those leveraging cloud-native technologies or needing quick integration with existing databases.

Software AG Adabas, on the other hand, is better suited for enterprises already using Software AG's ecosystem or those that require high-performance transaction processing with their legacy systems. It offers robustness and reliability for big data processing environments.

b) Pros and Cons

Hasura:

  • Pros:
    • Open-source with strong community support.
    • Rapidly enables application development with minimal setup.
    • Real-time GraphQL support.
    • Easily integrates with modern technologies and databases.
    • Cost-effective, especially for small to medium businesses.
  • Cons:
    • May lack some of the extensive, enterprise-level transaction processing capabilities found in older systems like Adabas.
    • Requires a modern tech stack for optimal use.
    • Some advanced security features might require external tools or plugins.

Software AG Adabas:

  • Pros:
    • Proven stability and reliability in large-scale implementations.
    • High-performance transaction processing.
    • Seamless integration with other Software AG products.
    • Supported by a comprehensive ecosystem for enterprise use.
  • Cons:
    • Higher cost, particularly for smaller organizations or those not already in the Software AG ecosystem.
    • Complexity in deployment and maintenance.
    • Less alignment with modern development practices compared to newer solutions like Hasura.

c) Recommendations for Users

  • For Newer Projects or Cloud-Native Applications: Consider Hasura if your project aims to leverage modern development practices, requires rapid development cycles, and prioritizes real-time capabilities. It’s particularly fitting for teams familiar with GraphQL or those starting new projects that can afford to adopt new technologies.

  • For Established Enterprises or Legacy Systems: Software AG Adabas is recommended for organizations that require robust, high-performance data processing and have existing commitments to Software AG products. It's ideal for enterprises where the transition to newer technologies would be cost-prohibitive or risky.

In summary, the decision between Hasura and Software AG Adabas should be driven by the specific needs of the organization. Consider the size, existing tech stack, performance requirements, and development goals to choose the most fitting solution.