Symantec Endpoint Security vs Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

Symantec Endpoint Security

Visit

Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

Visit

Description

Symantec Endpoint Security

Symantec Endpoint Security

In today’s world, safeguarding your business's digital environment is more important than ever. Symantec Endpoint Security makes it straightforward to protect all of your devices and data from potenti... Read More
Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control is a straightforward solution designed to help businesses keep track of and manage their devices. Think of it as a tool that allows you to see all the computers,... Read More

Comprehensive Overview: Symantec Endpoint Security vs Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

Symantec Endpoint Security

a) Primary Functions and Target Markets

  • Primary Functions:

    • Antivirus and Anti-Malware: Detection and removal of malicious software.
    • Behavioral Analysis: Utilizes machine learning to identify new threats based on behavior.
    • Intrusion Prevention: Detects and blocks threats before they impact the system.
    • Application and Device Control: Restricts access to certain applications and devices.
    • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): Provides detailed threat analytics and response capabilities.
    • Cloud-Based Services: Offers cloud-managed endpoint protection solutions.
  • Target Markets:

    • Small to Large Enterprises: Tailored solutions cater to businesses of all sizes, including highly regulated industries like finance, healthcare, and government.
    • Service Providers: Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) may offer this as part of their portfolio.

b) Market Share and User Base

  • Symantec, acquired by Broadcom, has historically had a strong presence in the endpoint security market. Its market share might not be as dominant as a few years back due to increased competition, but it still holds a significant portion of the enterprise segment.
  • The user base includes a diverse range of industries, with a robust presence in large enterprises due to its comprehensive security features.

c) Key Differentiating Factors

  • Comprehensive Threat Intelligence: Benefiting from Broadcom's vast resources and network, Symantec provides some of the industry's most robust threat intelligence.
  • Intrusion Prevention Capabilities: Strong focus on advanced threat prevention.
  • Industry Reputation and Legacy: Symantec is one of the oldest and most recognized names in cybersecurity.

Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

a) Primary Functions and Target Markets

  • Primary Functions:

    • Integrated Security Fabric: Connects with Fortinet’s broader security solutions for holistic visibility.
    • Application and Device Control: Similar to Symantec, focuses on restricting unauthorized devices and applications.
    • Real-Time Endpoint Information: Provides real-time monitoring and threat detection.
    • Collected Threat Intelligence: Gathers and utilizes global threat intelligence.
    • Seamless Integration: Particularly excels when integrated within a Fortinet ecosystem, including FortiGate firewalls and other devices.
  • Target Markets:

    • Medium to Large Enterprises: Especially those already utilizing Fortinet’s ecosystem.
    • Education, Healthcare, and Retail: Markets that require robust endpoint monitoring and control.
    • Government and MSSPs: Offers solutions suited to public sector and service providers.

b) Market Share and User Base

  • Fortinet has been growing its market presence progressively, with its integrated security approach boosting its appeal in multiple sectors.
  • The combination of endpoint security with network security solutions strengthens its appeal, resulting in an expanding user base particularly amongst existing Fortinet customers.

c) Key Differentiating Factors

  • Integrated Security Fabric: Seamlessly integrates with other Fortinet products for a holistic security posture.
  • Operational Efficiency: Known for ease of integration within existing Fortinet infrastructure, making it attractive for current Fortinet users.
  • Vendor Consolidation: Offers a single-vendor solution for organizations already using other Fortinet products.

Comparison Summary

  • Market Share and Influence: Symantec has a legacy and broad enterprise market presence due to its long-standing reputation, while Fortinet’s market share is growing due to its integrated security solutions.
  • Integration and Ecosystem: Symantec stands as a strong, standalone security solution, whereas Fortinet excels in environments where its security ecosystem is already deployed.
  • Key Differentiators: Symantec’s historical depth in threat intelligence and advanced prevention technologies contrasts with Fortinet’s strong network security integration and operational efficiency.

Overall, the choice between these solutions often comes down to existing infrastructure compatibility (favoring Fortinet within its ecosystem) versus seeking comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities (Symantec).

Contact Info

Year founded :

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Year founded :

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Not Available

Feature Similarity Breakdown: Symantec Endpoint Security, Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

When comparing Symantec Endpoint Security and Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control, it's important to note that while they share several core capabilities as endpoint protection solutions, there are also distinct differences that cater to various user needs. Here’s a breakdown comparing them:

a) Core Features in Common

  1. Malware Protection: Both Symantec and Fortinet offer real-time scanning and protection against viruses, malware, ransomware, and other malicious threats.

  2. Threat Intelligence: They leverage threat intelligence networks to provide insights into emerging threats and ensure systems are protected from the latest vulnerabilities.

  3. Firewall & Network Protection: Incorporation of firewalls to monitor and control incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predetermined security rules.

  4. Behavioral Analysis: Both utilize behavioral analysis to detect potentially harmful behavior by applications or executables.

  5. Centralized Management: These solutions provide centralized consoles to manage endpoints across the organization, enabling policy management, updates, and reporting.

  6. Incident Response: They offer tools for incident detection, investigation, and remediation to help mitigate threats effectively.

b) User Interface Comparison

  • Symantec Endpoint Security:

    • The interface is generally regarded as user-friendly with an advanced level of customization available for configuring and managing endpoints.
    • Visual dashboards provide comprehensive visibility into endpoint status and threat analytics.
    • Some users note that the interface can be somewhat complex, especially when configuring advanced settings, leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control:

    • Fortinet's interface follows a streamlined design integrated with the Fortinet Security Fabric, offering cohesion if using other Fortinet products.
    • The UI is intuitive, particularly for network-focused operations, with clear navigation paths and easily accessible tools for endpoint monitoring.
    • For users who employ multiple Fortinet solutions, the uniformity across the platform's UIs can facilitate easier training and user adoption.

c) Unique Features

  • Symantec Endpoint Security:

    • Advanced Machine Learning and AI: Symantec emphasizes their AI-based threat detection mechanisms that continuously improve through machine learning.
    • Intrusion Prevention: Beyond basic security features, Symantec offers more robust intrusion prevention mechanisms.
    • Cloud Integration: Strong cloud integration capabilities suitable for hybrid and multi-cloud environments, with secure access controls and data protection policies.
    • DLP Integration: Seamless integration with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) technologies for comprehensive data security.
  • Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control:

    • Integration with Fortinet Security Fabric: A unique advantage for those already using Fortinet solutions, allowing for broad network visibility and coordinated security across infrastructure.
    • Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Capabilities: Provides a robust set of tools for implementing zero trust principles across endpoints.
    • Security-Driven Networking: Incorporates networking controls alongside security, benefiting organizations looking for a closely-knit network security solution.
    • Scalability: Frequently highlighted for its scalability, particularly in geographically dispersed environments with complex network topologies.

Both solutions are robust in their own right and offer powerful security features that cater to enterprises with different security strategy focuses. The choice between them will often depend on an organization’s existing IT infrastructure, specific security needs, integrations, and overall strategy orientation.

Features

Not Available

Not Available

Best Fit Use Cases: Symantec Endpoint Security, Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

When comparing Symantec Endpoint Security and Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control, it's important to recognize that both products offer valuable features for securing endpoints, but they are tailored for different needs and contexts. Here's a breakdown of the best fit use cases for each:

Symantec Endpoint Security

a) Best Choice for Businesses or Projects:

  • Large Enterprises: Symantec is particularly well-suited for large organizations that require comprehensive and scalable security solutions. Their product is known for its extensive feature set, which includes advanced threat protection, behavior analysis, and machine learning for threat detection.
  • Organizations Needing Advanced Threat Protection: Companies that face sophisticated threats, such as ransomware or zero-day vulnerabilities, benefit from Symantec’s robust protection and incident response capabilities.
  • Businesses with Complex IT Environments: Those with diverse and complex IT environments, including hybrid clouds or multiple operating systems, find Symantec’s integration and management capabilities advantageous.

d) Industry Verticals and Company Sizes:

  • Financial Services: The strong emphasis on data protection and encryption appeals to financial institutions that handle sensitive information.
  • Healthcare: Symantec’s compliance features help healthcare organizations meet stringent regulatory requirements, such as HIPAA.
  • Large Multi-National Corporations: Symantec's global presence and comprehensive support structure are ideal for large, distributed organizations that require uniform security policies across multiple regions.

Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

b) Preferred Scenarios:

  • Organizations Focused on Network Security Integration: Companies already using Fortinet’s suite of products will benefit from seamless integration with existing network security infrastructure, enhancing overall visibility and control.
  • Midsize Businesses: Firms that need network-centric endpoint security without the complexity and overhead of large enterprise solutions often find Fortinet to be more approachable.
  • Industries in Highly Regulated Markets: Fortinet is effective in environments requiring detailed compliance oversight, offering tools that aid in visibility and control to meet industry regulations.

d) Industry Verticals and Company Sizes:

  • Retail: The emphasis on network integration and real-time threat intelligence makes Fortinet a good fit for retail businesses that need to protect point-of-sale systems and manage distributed locations.
  • Education: Fortinet’s ability to deliver network-wide visibility and control helps educational institutions manage diverse sets of devices across campuses.
  • Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs): The balance of feature-rich security with a manageable footprint and cost makes it appealing to SMEs that need robust protection without enterprise-sized budgets.

Both Symantec and Fortinet cater to different aspects of endpoint security. Symantec's strength lies in its comprehensive protection and data-centric approach suitable for larger enterprises and highly regulated industries. In contrast, Fortinet excels in environments where network security integration and visibility are paramount, serving industries where network threats are a significant concern.

Pricing

Symantec Endpoint Security logo

Pricing Not Available

Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control logo

Pricing Not Available

Metrics History

Metrics History

Comparing undefined across companies

Trending data for
Showing for all companies over Max

Conclusion & Final Verdict: Symantec Endpoint Security vs Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

When evaluating Symantec Endpoint Security and Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control, it's essential to consider various factors including functionality, ease of use, cost, and customer support. Here is a detailed analysis and conclusion:

a) Overall Best Value

Symantec Endpoint Security generally offers the best overall value for organizations that require a comprehensive, robust security solution with a long-standing reputation in the cybersecurity industry. It excels in threat intelligence, behavioral analysis, and integrates well in larger enterprises with complex IT infrastructures. Symantec's mature ecosystem provides detailed security analytics and extensive endpoint management capabilities.

b) Pros and Cons

Symantec Endpoint Security

  • Pros:

    • Comprehensive Threat Protection: Strong in malware detection, ransomware protection, and zero-day vulnerabilities due to its advanced machine learning and threat intelligence network.
    • Scalability: Ideal for large enterprises with complex IT requirements.
    • Integration: Integrates seamlessly with other Symantec and third-party security products.
    • Reliability: A well-established market presence with a proven track record.
  • Cons:

    • Cost: Higher cost, which might not be suitable for small to medium-sized businesses.
    • Complexity: Steeper learning curve and requires significant IT expertise to implement and manage effectively.

Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control

  • Pros:

    • Network Integration: Excellent for organizations already using Fortinet’s network security solutions due to robust integration.
    • Simplicity: Generally easier to deploy and manage, especially in environments utilizing other Fortinet equipment.
    • Cost-Effective: Generally more affordable; good for small to medium-sized businesses or those with tighter budgets.
  • Cons:

    • Limited Advanced Features: Less comprehensive advanced threat detection compared to Symantec.
    • Smaller Deployment: May not be as scalable for very large enterprises with complex requirements.
    • Lesser Reputation: Not as long-established in the endpoint security space as Symantec.

c) Recommendations for Users

  • For Enterprises with Extensive Needs: If your organization is large with complex IT needs, a higher budget, and existing integration with other Symantec products, Symantec Endpoint Security is probably the better choice. It offers a comprehensive suite of features and robust endpoint protection which is critical for large-scale operations.

  • For Businesses with Fortinet Infrastructure: If your business already uses Fortinet’s firewall and network security products, or if simplicity and ease of management are priorities, Fortinet Endpoint Visibility & Control might be the preferable option. This will allow a more seamless security management experience within your existing IT infrastructure.

  • For Budget-Conscious Organizations: Smaller businesses or those with limited IT resources and budget constraints might find Fortinet’s solution more accessible and easier to implement without sacrificing necessary endpoint protection capabilities.

Ultimately, the choice between Symantec and Fortinet will depend on your organization’s specific needs, existing IT structure, and budget considerations. Consider conducting a trial of both products if possible, to evaluate their fit within your operational environment.